You failed one too many times to reply to my questions, but i will respond to every single one of your questions. LEt's see who's shallow/garbage/one with zero knowledge.
This is a challenge! If you consider yourself an ismailie, then put up your best foot forward and at least have a decency to admit you have no clue or answer to simple questions that every Ismailie is supposed to know. But first your answers.
nuseri wrote:
Ya Ali Madad.
firstly show me where Imam has said
there is pluralism is accepting his farmans.
Farameen Mubarak is directly subject to murid's understanding. You say potato, I say tomato. If we can't accept each other's level of understanding, then we end up like what we are doing now. But, if there's pluralism, then we I accept your version, and you accept mine. With time as your knowledge and undersanding elevates, then we would come to a common understanding of reality. If you don't see pluralism, then there's a problem with the vesion of pluralism that you come to know.
nuseri wrote:
you are a ABSOLUTE coward tariqati telling reason of pluralism for farman acceptance.Next he will show ismaili can select best from other faith n religions.
This is purly your opinion and your subjective judgement. Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Ismaili
is the Sirat-ul-Mustaqim, there's no need to select from any faith, such as hindu or sunnie or christianity. True Ismailism is the true path! Please back up your claim, otherwise it is again another one of your opinion, fueled by rage and hate!
nuseri wrote:
you are having info of printed doctrine with zero imaan on MHI is very dangerous.
How do you know I have "zero imaan"? Are you god or imam? do you know and understand peoples belief? or is it that anyone who agrees with you enters paradise and whoever opposes you, is immidiately coward and with zero imaan? From where I see, you don't have any imaan, because you insult the Hujjats and question MHI's authority! So, let observers be the judge.
nuseri wrote:
I purposely attacked the hujjat to get to the source of data,as you put all data of other people as his own shallow thing and dangerously trying to explain to others.
This must be one of the siliest thing I ever heard to attack the great Hujjat (remember attacking the Hujjat of the Imama, is equal to attacking the Imam Himself). No Ismailie in their correct state of mind must ever do this. But, yet you not only did it, and openly amdit it and not sorry at all. And you would do it again, just to satisfy your ego and fuel even more your hatred. Brave, you are on your way! If you don't understand something, don't assume it is wrong. The concepts that I explain, like i said, is available publicly, if you are welling to study. If you aren't interested and don't read it, that doesn't mean everyone else won't. It's dangerous only to those who don't understand it, and draw false conclusion. Exactly like what you are doing!! If you hate me, don't take it on our great Hujjats! Attack me, but not our Hujjats and Imams.
nuseri wrote:
All sufi,sagas n dai were first n foremost had conviction of Ali Allah
They sure have reached the level of realization and there's no doubt about that. How do you know they had a conviction of Ali Allah? Is there a farmaan? did they tell you?
Infact, anyone with true believe must believe in Tawhid! This is one of the very first principal of Islam and Ismailis! Please read the Ismaili Constitution and see what does it say about Tawheed. Do you even know what Tawheed is? Do you know what is Wahdat? You have no idea at all! If you do, please prove me wrong! I'd love to hear your story. If you don't satisfy the very first principal of Ismaili, then how can you claim, you have reached realization? As if you don't pass first grade, and yet you claim you completed university!
nuseri wrote:
face of central asia persons is poor aid taking segment of khoja donors.
What are you trying to say? Sorry your english is poor, sometimes I don't want to mis interpret what you intend to say. Please clarify, before jump to conclusion without understanding your intentions, unlike you.
nuseri wrote:
you are not the face but an alm seeking person.
I never claimed
I am face of Ismailie and I will never claim. It was MHI who mentioned that! Now it's up to you whether to take it or leave it, as you already did.
nuseri wrote:
You DO NOT BELIEVE
1.FARMANS
BATIN ASPECT OF FAITH
ZERO UNDERSTANDING RICH FARSI DOCTINES.
There's no way one can measure belief of someone else, except Maula Himself! There's no way you can measure my belief of Iman, there's simply no way! And same is true for me. There's no way I can judge your belief of Imaan, and that's why I don't. We can draw some conclusion based on what we reflect, such as questioning the Imam's authority or attacking the Hujjats. Then we can somewhat conclude that one doesn't believe or has no Imaan. But without such ground, there's no way you can judge anyone's belief.
So you appear to have a good understanding of "rich farsi doctrine". Tell us what's farsi doctrine? Is there such thing exist as "farsi doctrine"? Please englighten me! I'd love to learn from you about this "rich farsi doctrine"...
nuseri wrote:
You may cleverness n ability to put up point suiting your need.
nobody is willing to read it,and it's can lower the faith level or confuse
other faithful ismails.
My good friend, I don't consider myself to be clever or smart at all. I am a very ordinary person who's still a seeker and still have a lot of questions. But, if you think I am clever, then I am flattered and appreciate the complement.
Second, I don't put things to suit my convinience. I am simply asking for correction from you! and other participants! Please correct me what I am saying is so wrong! I am trying to learn, if you can convince me. I am not shy to say, i don't know. Please if you think I am saying something which is totally incorrect, then show me the way. Show me the right way. But, if you have no answer to tell me, and yet to blame me, then something doesn't sound right.
nuseri wrote:
Leader had concern of this website being started by strong haqiqati
maybe little stubborn that is website doe not become breeding or media
reformist or shallow ismailis weakning our faith.
seeing the posting of one a Imam hater
and another with no respect fro farman or Noorani status of Imam.
trying to post lengthy un ismaili material on average 3 posting a day.
Imam hater = who's Imam hater? (The one who question HIS authority!)
no respect to farmaan = who has no respect to farmaan? (Show me where have I disrespected any farmaan or any ismailie tariqa or belief)
norani status of Imam = who disrespected and questioned the Imam's authority?
un ismaili material = please point un ismaili material! (or according to you, only when one say Ali is Allah, they are considered ismailie, and all else is shalow iman/no imaan/zero knowledge?) Is this how you draw conclusion what's considered as an ismaili materla? Wow mind blowing!
nuseri wrote:
YOU ARE UNFIT TO BE CALLED AS AN ISMAILE LOOKING AT YOUR OPINION N BELIEF IN IMAM.
Again this is your opinion, and at this point I really don't care what you think. You failed multiple times over and over to show me on what basis do you say this. I am saying it's actually yourself. Because I can prove it to you, and quote you!
- you question MHI's authority, and you still stand corrected!
- you attacked the Hujjat of the Imam, which is the same as attacking the Imam Himself, and you still stand corrected!
Based on these, I am really not certain if you are fit to be an ismailie. But yet, I don't allow myself to call you a non-ismailie.
But you my fried, have no proof at all to tell me I am unfit to be an ismailie! It's not your place to call anyone a non-ismailie! Remember that.
One thing's for sure, debate with you will only go down the drain, and I really want to spend my time doing better things, and not babysit your questions. Nevertheless, I wish you well in your journey. May you one day find the truth.